Block Resource Centres (BRCs) and Cluster Resource Centres (CRCs) constitute an important middle-level institutional architecture within India's school education system. Originally conceived under the District Primary Education Programme and subsequently strengthened through Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and Samagra Shiksha, these structures were intended to decentralise academic support, facilitate teacher professional development, provide on-site mentoring, and connect schools with district-level academic institutions. In practice, however, the role of Block Resource Centre Coordinators (BRCCs) and Cluster Resource Centre Coordinators (CRCCs) has increasingly involved monitoring, compliance reporting, data collection, programme implementation, and administrative coordination. This article examines the resulting tension between academic monitoring and academic support and explores how the role of BRC/CRC personnel is changing under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, Samagra Shiksha, competency-based education, foundational literacy and numeracy, digital monitoring and continuous professional development (CPD).The article adopts a qualitative conceptual-review and policy-document analysis approach. Evidence is drawn from the National Education Policy 2020, Samagra Shiksha implementation documents, UDISE+ data, NCERT guidelines, and empirical literature concerning teacher mentoring and resource-person systems. The analysis suggests that monitoring and support should not be treated as mutually exclusive functions; rather, monitoring becomes educationally productive when it generates reliable evidence that is converted into context-specific feedback, mentoring, demonstration, collaborative problem-solving, and follow-up. Conversely, monitoring becomes counterproductive when it is reduced to inspection, compliance, documentation, or surveillance. The article proposes a Support-Centred Monitoring Model in which BRC/CRC personnel function primarily as instructional mentors, data-informed facilitators, professional-learning leaders, and connectors between schools and teacher-education institutions. The paper concludes with implications for role redesign, capacity building, workload rationalisation, digital systems, accountability structures, and future empirical research.
Ali, Ibrahim & Mohamed, Mazin. (2017). Educational Management, Educational Administration and Educational Leadership: Definitions and General concepts. 10.21276/sasjm.2017.3.12.2.
Azim Premji University. (2016). Evolution of cluster-level monthly meetings as a forum for continuous professional development: Uttarakhand.
Dubay, Suchi (2021) The changed role of CRC, BRC, DIET. Learning Curve. 99-102. ISSN 2582-1644. http://publications.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/id/eprint/3212
George, Anit S., Thulasidharan, T.V. (2023) Academic Support of Block Resource Centres in Elementary Education. Santhom Journal of Edu. RACE. 8(1), 16-23.
Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.
Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2022). Samagra Shiksha: An integrated scheme for school education—Framework for implementation. Department of School Education and Literacy.
Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2025). UDISE+ 2024–25: Report on school education in India. Department of School Education and Literacy
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. 10.3102/0034654318759268
Ministry of Education. (2022). NISHTHA: National Initiative for School Heads’ and Teachers’ Holistic Advancement. Government of India.
Mishra, P.K., (2024) Implementation of the Right to Education Act, 2009: A Study of CRCCs’ Perceptions on Quality in Elementary Education. Bharati international journal of multidisciplinary research & development. 5(2) https://doi.org/10.70798/Bijmrd/020500022
Mishra, Rashmi. (2014) Role of BRCs And CRCs in Improving the Quality of Education at Elementary Level in Odisha: Issues and Challenges. Social Science International.30(2)381-389.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2022). Guidelines for 50 hours of continuous professional development for teachers, head teachers and teacher educators. NCERT.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2024). NIPUN Bharat Mission: Stakeholders—Roles and responsibilities.
Panda, Sanatan, Mohanty, M.M. (2013). Elementary Teachers’ Perception of Monitoring Personnel at the Cluster Level in Odisha. Pedagogy of Learning, 1 (2), 83-96.
Tara, S. N. (2007). Indian elementary education at the crossroads: way forward. Education 3-13, 35(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270601103285
Timperley, H. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328–369.
Timperley, H. S., & Parr, J. M. (2007). Closing the achievement gap through evidence-based inquiry at multiple levels of the education system. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1).
Vivek, K., Bhattacharjee, P., Mani, S., & Kumar, A. (2021). Strengthening teacher mentoring and monitoring systems: Evidence from India. World Bank.
Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2023). Samagra Shiksha: Academic support through BRCs/URCs and CRCs. Department of School Education and Literacy.
Department of School Education and Literacy. (2025). UDISE+ 2024–25: National and state-wise highlights. Ministry of Education, Government of India.
Swati Mishra ; Dr. Chandan Shrivastava
441-448
10.5281/zenodo.23424269
Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.