• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
• Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1099. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z
• Alotaibi, M. (2024). Game-based learning in early childhood education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1307881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307881
• Amnouychokanant, V. (2025). Reducing anxiety among EFL learners through gamification: An empirical study of instructional impact. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/14298
• Beckers, J. J., Wicherts, J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). Computer anxiety: “Trait” or “State”? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2851–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.001
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2277814
• Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2020). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–22585
• Buhl-Wiggers, J., la Cour, L., Franck, M., & Kjærgaard, A. (2023). Investigating effects of teachers in flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial study of classroom-level heterogeneity. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00396-4
• Buragohain, D., Deng, C., Sharma, A., & Chaudhary, S. (2024). The impact of immersive learning on teacher effectiveness: A systematic study. IEEE Access, 12, 35924–35933. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3373541
• Charlton, J. P. (2005). The role of competition in educational games: Psychological implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.024
• Chua, S. L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4
• Clipa, O., Delibaș, C.-S., & Mâță, L. (2023). Teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards the use of information technology in classrooms. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101001
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
• Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
• Di Giacomo, D., Guerra, F., Perilli, E., & Ranieri, J. (2020). Technophobia as emerging risk factor in aging: Investigation on computer anxiety dimension. Health Psychology Research, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2020.8207
• Gopalan, C. (2024). Enhancing student learning with flipped teaching and retrieval practice integration. AJP Advances in Physiology Education, 49(1), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00080.2024
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? —A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
• Hanif, M., Mustaji, M., & Arianto, F. (2025). A systematic review of the impact of flipped learning on the emotional attributes of college students. Journal of Learning for Development, 12(2), 386–402. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1480609.pdf
• Harrer, M., Adam, S. H., Messner, E. M., Baumeister, H., Cuijpers, P., Bruffaerts, R., & Ebert, D. D. (2018). Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28(2), e1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1759
• Harrer, M., Apolinário-Hagen, J., Fritsche, L., Drüge, M., Krings, L., Beck, K., Salewski, C., Zarski, A., Lehr, D., Baumeister, H., & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Internet- and app-based stress intervention for distance-learning students with depressive symptoms: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00361
• Hava, K. (2024). A systematic review of flipped learning in EFL education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2024.12.4.556
• He, S., Shi, X., Choi, T., & Zhai, J. (2023). How do students’ roles in collaborative learning affect collaborative problem-solving competency? A systematic review of research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101423
• Henderson, J., & Corry, M. (2021). Teacher anxiety and technology change: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1931426
• Herrmann, T., & Kienle, A. (2008). Context-oriented communication and the design of computer-supported discursive learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9045-5
• Herrmann, T., Kienle, A., & Butscher, S. (2017). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive load and group dynamics. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 567–578.
• Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029
• Kumar, A., & Neha. (2024). The impact of digital literacy programs on marginalized communities: A comprehensive analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32359.66723
• Le, H., Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2024). The benefits of peer mentoring in higher education: Findings from a systematic review. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1447398.pdf
• Liu, H., Liu, Y., Yu, C., Zhang, J., & Wan, L. (2025). Research on digital project-based learning: An effective way to promote the construction of new excellent classrooms. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 131–146). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3738-6_11
• Liu, L. (2022). The contribution of the flipped learning environment to value perception and controllability of classroom activities as antecedents of learners’ anxiety: A control-value approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1000710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000710
• Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2025). Enhancing student GAI literacy in digital multimodal composing through development and validation of a scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 166, 108569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108569
• Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807
• Lobão, C., et al. (2025). Microteaching simulations in teacher education: Reducing digital anxiety through experiential practice. Teaching and Teacher Education.
• Madrid‐Cagigal, A., Kealy, C., Potts, C., Mulvenna, M. D., Byrne, M., Barry, M. M., & Donohoe, G. (2025). Digital mental health interventions for university students with mental health difficulties: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 19(3), e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70017
• Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
• Nebel, S. (2017). Investigating the mechanisms of competition within educational video games. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28445.41440
• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 479–500). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.029
• Tran, Q., Verezub, E., & Fisher, R. (2025). The impact of flipped classroom on EFL students’ reading anxiety in higher education. TESL-EJ, 113(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29113a3
• UNESCO. (2023). Transformation of education in the digital age. In 2023 UNESCO Global SIDS Dialogue. https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2023/03/2023%20UNESCO%20Global%20SIDS%20Dialogue-cn-en.pdf
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
• Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1995). The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 95–133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)00026-E
• Wilson, M. L., Huggins-Manley, A. C., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Ruggles, K. (2022). Development of the abbreviated technology anxiety scale (ATAS). Behavior Research Methods, 55(1), 185–199.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01820-9
• World Economic Forum. (2022). Future of jobs report 2022. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
• Zhang, K., & Yu, Z. (2022). Effects of gamification on learning outcomes, satisfaction, engagement, and motivation in virtual learning environments between 2020 and 2022. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijopcd.306684
• Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
• Zhang, Z., Maeda, Y., Newby, T., Cheng, Z., & Xu, Q. (2022). The effect of preservice teachers’ ICT integration self-efficacy beliefs on their ICT competencies: The mediating role of online self-regulated learning strategies. Computers & Education, 193, 104673.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104673
• Zumeri, S. (2016). Albert Bandura – Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (W. H. Freeman & Co., 1997). www.academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/28274869/Albert_Bandura_Self_Efficacy_The_Exercise_of_Control_W_H_Freeman_and_Co_1997_pdf